Friday, March 23, 2007

Politics in America. We get what we deserve

One would think that given two full years before the next presidential election we would be getting down to some real nitty gritty on the issues that plague this country.
The Dems are all fired up (with no place to go and no 'nads to get them where they promised they'd take us) after last November. And The Republicans are stumbling over themselves for positioning, because well, really, you don't have to glow in the dark with charisma to outshine the current resident in the White House in the areas of intelligence or credibility.
So what do we get instead of supporting our troops by bringing them home? Peace in the middle east? A plan for social security and health care? A remedy for global warming. A solution for the decay of the constitutional rights for the American people?
We get bombarded with issues like, is Obama really black enough? Can Hillary sing at all? "Same sex marriages". That Guilianni guy...you know how many times he's been married? What did Bidden mean when he said Obama was "clean"? Did you know that Barack likes to kick back with a burner now and again and he's trying to quit? Or how about that Hillary spoof film clip on YouTube? How dastardly can this Obama be to have any (even remote) association with the guy that put that video together? (Never mind that it was a press secretary of his who roomed with the creative end of that clip over a year before he came to work in Obama's camp!)
The point is fairly clear that the real issues that have a daily impact on you and I are once again (and still) taking a back seat to all of the evasive flares and maneuvers that has become what choosing genuine leadership in this country has become.
Everybody waits for the next media feeding frenzy on the personal trivial minutia of the candidates to cloud over what the real national concerns are and/or should be and we get to watch the magic show that is our culture lure us into watching the pretty little, scantily clad assistant who has nothing to do with the actual prestidigitation, instead of getting to the meat of the illusion.
The horror is we keep coming away totally surprised, caught unaware and mesmerized at the caliber of characters (or lack of it) that we so often end up with in the seats of power and representation, again and again and again.
If repetition is any indicator, we deserve what we get.

Friday, February 09, 2007

Conspiracy charges. One size fits all (but the mighty)


A mother in Wilmington, Delaware and her companion were arrested this past Wednesday and later released on bail pending trial for forcing her ten year old son to strip naked and stand outside in the cold "because they wanted him to see how cold it really was out there''.
Now in no way would I so much as attempt to excuse or justify this act of cruelty or pretend to understand the state of mind (or inebriation) that these two people were in when they drew this conclusion and embarked on such a twisted life lesson for the child.
Simultaneously, I'm having a hard time getting my mind around the charges that these people were brought up on and charged with...Well, one of them anyway.
Both women were charged with conspiracy and endangering the welfare of a child.
Fair enough on the latter...but the former? Conspiracy?
What am I missing?
Were there clandestine meetings between the two prior to and leading up to this stupidly impulsive act? Am I or are we expected to believe that a plot was born from whispers and nurtured, swaddled in Fagan-esque calculation beforehand then carried out according to a predefined plan based on devious concealment and subterfuge leading later to attempts to cover up the deed and the do-ers in order that any trails would be torturously convoluted so as not to be exposed and impossible for anyone to prove?
According to the short version of law, "conpiracy" is "an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act."
Such a generic, broad based definition is hardly ever the first thing that comes to mind in the case of "black helicopters", or provocative practices and events ranging from the Bay of Tonkin to the assassination of Lincoln, Kennedy, Kennedy, Martin Luther King or more currently the war in Iraq.
Obviously there's a massive abyss between what the common man and a judge or attorney might prosecute or defend as an act of conspiracy.
And if language between us itself is this skewed and disjointed, perhaps we as Americans should find someone else to represent us in our own courts of law besides someone from the American Bar Association or the local/state/federal judicial departments. Obviously, we're talking apples and oranges, any more.
In spite of the obvious and evident misrepresentations and deliberate falsehoods that can be presented as circumstantial evidence (if nothing more) in the current administrations lead up to the war in Iraq, not one charge of conspiracy has been leveled much less officially uttered in accusation in spite of the hisorically contradictory sound bites of the last 4 years.
Yet somehow we are led to believe that "conspiracy" in the case of these folks (ok misguided cretins, if you like) in Delaware; as well as the growing number of people being apprehended for random acts of stupidity and cruelty in this country each day is somehow a charge that is justifiable and right on the money?
There's a huge gap here folks that requires a suspension of belief that up until now was only required for Saturday afternoon viewing of full-length feature cartoons and Disney fantasies on the big screen, while whipping Milk Duds at the cute girl with pigtails two rows ahead of you.
The problem is, while the common citizen, though (in the Delaware case) appearing most likely guilty of uncommon actions and unlikable deeds and decisions are falling well within the legal definition of "conspiracy" the larger than life, wealthy and/or powerful, true conspirators of our time are able to avoid that Scarlet Letter and branding which is rapidly becoming a catch all (every bit of pun intended) for the control and containment of Americas general citizenry.
In time, along with that traffic ticket you may get pulled over for, or the D.U.I. or the unbuckled seat belt, we may actually be charged with conspiracy. Technically, according to the laws that the common person is subject to, it would be an applicable charge even today. Especially if you happen to be car pooling or transporting a passenger.
Because according to the law, it only takes two people for a conspiracy charge…unless of course you happen to be a lobbyist, Captain of Industry, politician or a president and his staff…then regardless of what you may do, you will never need worry about being charged under any circumstance with conspiracy.
Hell, no one of any influence or authority will even mention it let alone charge you with it.

Tuesday, November 21, 2006

Bam! Just Like That! : Cosmo Kramer



By now everyone has seen or heard about Michael Richards losing it and spouting the "N word" while on stage at a comedy club in California. Not only did he come out with it, but he repeated it so many times I thought it was part of his routine. God bless the media for blowing it up larger than life itself and letting me know otherwise.
I mean, what would I have done or become if I had never known?
The truth be known, my life probably wouldn't have changed an iota without the education. And now with it, not so much, either.
Sure it was offensive. He intended it to be. But that doesn't make it lethal or truly injurous beyond someone's ego, regardless.
If those of us who can do so, were to call on the memory of the late Lenny Bruce we would see that he was a champion of trying to bring the "N word" and just about every other ethnic label and stereo type to their knees by pointing out that they were all, after all, simply words and in fact meaningless. And more to the point, these words were benign in their own right. It was Bruce's contention that it was our own sensitivity that was the malignancy. That and the nasty habit of human nature that creates these nicknames and euphemisms to further drive wedges between all cultures on a global scale. His repetition of the N word, the K word, the W word, the S word...you name the "word" he used them all over and over again in an attempt to desensitize us to them.
If the same words "Kramer" used had come from say, Eddie Murphy or Redd Foxx and was equally inclusive of the wrath that Richards felt he was somehow justified in publicly delivering, it would have never made YouTube, let alone the national news for 72 hours.
Certainly not when there's a whole lot more going on at this minute that hangs like the sword of Damocles over billions of people suffering the uncertainties and injustices of the human condition on this planet.
Forget the label folks and our differences will fade away, as well they should have by now.
The real offense of this whole "racist" incident...(I personally consider it a linguistics incident myself and little more) was the comment made by fellow comedian Paul Rodriguez who opined that "Even freedom of speech has its limitations..."
This is the only genuinely offensive and, yes, frightening thing I heard uttered with regard to the incident in the last three days!
Because when we start to believe that "freedom" of speech has any limitations what so ever, we're not only buying in to a whole 'nuther package than the one laid out by our constitution and the dreams of our founding fathers, but we're pretty much making a conscious choice between limitations AND freedom.
To accept the two concepts spoken in tandem and forget that they are mutually exclusive, is to accept an oxymoron of the highest order.
You either live with freedom or you live with limitations.
And so...while a few patrons of the Laugh Factory may have felt offended by what was said from the stage, I think the real problem, the real erosion of the fabric of our society and culture was ultimately dealt by the interviews afterwards.
By the way...have you ever heard Paul Rodriguez' routine especially in his younger days? I thought his depictions of street Latinos and blacks were often irreverent and could have been regarded by many as offensive. But I simply found him to be a funny guy, just like Michael Richards, actually. Rant or no rant. The words are the same, whether the passion was or not.
But Oh, I stand (somehow) corrected. He was, after all speaking of "his own". So that was perfectly acceptable.
Until that is, you realize that the worst ethnic slur and divisive remark that has been spoken for decades in this country and others is this whole attitude that, "I can talk about my own and call them anything I like but you can't talk the same way about my own! Because they happen to be MY own"...It's just an elitist wedge that keeps us from recognizing and accepting the fact that we're all really all from the same damned family after all.
And there really is no "(insert letter here)-word that can change any of that...unless you choose to buy in to it because you find it satisfying to have some illusionary badge of honor that sets you apart from that which you can never subtract yourself from in the first place. Well, that's the way it would seem until you're offended by mere words spoken to you from the stage of a small comedy club somewhere.
It's just a word, an outdated and tired label.
Stop using it to distance yourself and perhaps others will use it less.
Doing anything less to put an end to constantly being offended when other people (not of "your own") use it and then claiming you've been offended is pure bullshit!
Oops. Now I've offended the bovines!

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Bam! Just Like That!
Peace in Iraq: Toppling the scales of Justice


The one guy successful for keeping a lid on Sunni/Shia civil war and daily car bombings and law and order, keeping the hospitals/schools open, the roads repaired and the electricity and plumbing running for 2 decades at least at a 200% better rate than the last 3+ years has been convicted and sentenced for his policies being responsible for crimes against humanity in the 1982 killings of 148 people. A trial and verdict for another 100,000 people is pending.

(Double that if you like and it still stands diminished by at least 50% compared to even the the lowest marginal estimate which has been reported as the number of direct resultant deaths caused by the US invasion of Iraq, even if you were to cut the figures of that report by 200,000 fatal casualties. Applying the same margin of error to the other side of those figures however, the US gets the credit for 800,000 deaths rather than 400,000. The reported average is 600,000 souls. Any way you slice it...we're talking close to a half million souls on one end of the possibility spectrum or close to a million on the other! Hands down in either case a much bigger act of inhumanity than what Sadamm is to be hanged for.)

Meanwhile, in the space of 3+ years, US policy has been directly accountable for the deaths of a reported 600,000 civilians in Iraq (see above) and nearly 3000 Americans, has destroyed a large % of that country's infrastructure, caused the escalation of not only religious infighting but political as well, through out the region, and has been proven just as capable, culpable and deft as Saddam has been for the implementation of "imprisonment and torture" of the Iraqi people.

Given that during Iraq's US supported war against Iran in the 80's Saddam was the President of Iraq and acted against Iranian backed insurgencies and uprisings in his soveriegn nation with no more or less compassion than any world leader in the past historically has offered (see American Civil war)... the US invasion/occupation was a matter of choice on proved questionable cause against a soveriegn nation.
Who would appear to be the more successful peace keeper and the less inhumane of these two defendants?
For far less death and destruction, in his favor, Saddam was at least competent and efficient in securing Iraq and creating order out of chaos for the Iraqis.
We on the other hand, took that order and the involuntary and tragic sacrifices made leading up to it and returned Iraq to a chaos greater than existed prior to the strong handed policies of their last President.
So, tell me. Who's keeping the peace now?
Skip the hype and the character assasination that was generated to justify our invasion, packaged and sold on falsehoods.
Just do the math and more, view the aftermath.
According to findings of the kangaroo court put in place to aid my country in it's mercenary causes and the conquest of a regime, it would certainly seem that in the eyes of justice, having found a way to establish and maintain at least a moderate level of peace in Iraq is a far more henious crime to humanity than destroying it completely on a whim.
As I said, skip the spin. Do the math.
If afterwards you still think we're any less guilty than Saddam for what's been happening in Iraq...you will probably never "get it".

Thursday, October 26, 2006

Fun Facts From Zach's Almanac: Please don't feed the animals!


I'm suffering from "electile" dysfunction and there's not a blue pill in the world that can possibly make me excited over running to the polls to throw my support behind what my 30 plus years of voting have proved to me to be every American's right to wallow in futility and the further entropy of our system of government.
To quote Robert Anton Wilson:
"If voting could change the system, it would be illegal.
If not voting could change the system it would be illegal."


Yet the time to vote has come upon us once more. Strike up the band. Bring out your babies to be kissed. Hang the bunting. Bend over. Grab your ankles. And wake me when it's over so I can once more wonder why it hurts when I sit down ever since my nap.
Across this great land of ours the race is on for many to vie for that dream job that but a couple hundred people can ever nab, out of a population of (now) 300 million.
A bucket o' perks including lobbyist favors and contributions, a great salary, a lifetime pension, medical coverage that the vast majority of people in this country literally die for each and every day and a status quo that has been milked by the same two interchangeable parties for so long that you can almost hear the mooing on Capitol Hill from New Jersey to San Francisco. But for the American people, the ones who actually feed this Matrix, hardly anything changes regardless of who gets an office in the Dome or a reserved seat on the floor.
Worse than stagnation, as a result of the last few elections, this country has somehow managed to back slide by 20 years, legislatively which by my observations will take at least 40 years of the rusty wheels of government screechingly turning to even deliver us to what forward momentum we had politically 10 years ago.
"Fuhgedabout" moving forward and/or addressing the real issues that face this country and it's policy that have been back burnered to pork barrel bill add-ons and party affiliations since even I was a lad.
While the hot button issues debated and moved upon remain to be centered around and never beyond moral directives, government interference into people's personal choices and social engineering in general, the same issues that matter to the people but not the politicians, evidently, keep getting the bums rush and an end run around any hope of definitive legislation. Social Security, medical care for the elderly and the truly infirmed at a fair price, a genuine move towards alternative energies and loosening the resource gluttony that has the world itself hacking up phlegm every morning, improving/providing some honest to God education to the young of this country instead of putting them in educational warehouses for 12 to 16 years simply for the purpose of controlling the flow of employable people into an already over loaded employment based economy. These are the same sorts of problems that have haunted the American people for decades and continue to remain un-addressed by the promise pimps with any real sincerity.
So me? I'll be a little more difficult to become aroused this election around. And 2008 looks like less of an attraction.
I'm going to do my part and I hope you will too.
Please, don't feed the animals.
You know, either the elephant or the jackass… becauseit's costing us really way too much to even think that we can afford pets like this anymore.
For all the good they seem to do, they just trash up the house...and the Senate too!

Friday, August 04, 2006

Bam! Just like that! Lebanon...

...or
Uh, this ain't your father's terrorism, Baby!

ter·ror·ism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (tr-rzm)n.
The unlawful use or threatened use of force or violence by a person or an organized group against people or property with the intention of intimidating or coercing societies or governments, often for ideological or political reasons.

War is terrorism too...just with a bigger budget.


Sunday, July 23, 2006

Fun Facts from Zach's Almanac: Ah, summer.



The summer months are probably the hardest for sitting down to espouse in writing, moments of personal illumination.
Equally inhibiting is the knowing that many of ones min-epiphanies are often glaringly self evident to pretty much anyone that might happen by the site here and read them.
It's hard out here for a pseudo-philosopher!
But I've been back to this site now several times over the course of summer and to be honest with all of you…yeah, the picture of the dead guy is a downer and has got to go!
With this in mind and still coming up short on having any great observations or revelations to cover these walls with, I thought I'd share a small koan here with you.
If you're not familiar with the term, a "koan" is generally a short question or riddle, illustrating a ponderence in the shape of a "catch 22" that one can use to "step out of the box" every now and again whenever your immediate situation calls for you to change your perspective.
And then, guess what. You find it sticking to the inside of your head, repeating itself when you least expect it, like a tacky little pop song from the days of AM radio.
Probably the most well known koan is "What is the sound of one hand clapping?"
This one in particular slays me.

The quotes above are a bit different and not quite as brief. But a favorite koan of mine and not an all too terrible piece of advice on how we go about processing our observations on the world around ourselves.
I fell upon the first half of it in an early chapter of a book by a madman I've been re-reading this summer. I'm re-reading it specifically because I suspected there was more to it than just the story line and more than I was capable of understanding ten or 12 years ago. I was right.
The second half of this koan comes from a conversation in a chapter much further on in the book. But it occurred to me that bringing them together was a possibility and perhaps just what was intended all along by the author.
I'll be back later. Hope you make it back here sometime too.
(And should you be one of those people who actually miss the picture of the dead guy, you can still find him below.)

Thursday, June 08, 2006

Bam! Just like that! The last waltz for al-Zarqawi (or Dancing in the U.S.A.)


Ok. So ya do what you gotta do and sometimes it's not pretty.
All in all, much like the sport of fishing, which pits the two most diverse extremes of the evolutionary food chain against each other, this world's modern super power, using the most advanced technology throughout all recorded history has managed to (after years of effort)track down and annihilate one of it's most recent annoying ideological, desert dwelling, fugitive enemies.
Like I said, sometimes you simply do what you've got to do.
I guess the problem I have with it, if any, is the once again global publication of the photograph of the corpse of the vanquished.
Such too, was the case with the sons of Saddam. And I thought we had perhaps learned better by now.
In the past in Somalia and in Bahgdad, when photos of our own murdered native sons and daughters we're put into global publication by the perpetrators, the general reaction from American leadership and it's public was outrage over such a callous display of barbarism and inhumanity. This went well beyond spiking the football after a touchdown. This was mean spirited and irreverent, a ridicule unbefitting the dead.
We on the other hand; who rally so often about the breech to moral and legal compacts and conventions when the "heathens" and "savages" do it, seem to have no compunction to respond in kind when it is we who manage to declare victory through the act of extinguishing the life force from any major (or minor) adversary in our chosen arena of battle. And then in our own manner, albeit elctronically, we prance the head of our victim on the tip of a spike so all the world can see our grand accomplishments.
A double standard?
You bet.
One in a list of many.
But if we ever think we can justifiably demand a higher set of moral standards from the world around us, be they friend or foe, we had better start honoring the same standards we demand of others. Or this whole civility of war and rules of engagement myth that everyone keeps demanding for themselves but shun for all others, will keep getting nastier and nastier as time and battles wear on.
Of course there's the option of refraining from killing for revenge, power, strategic positioning, resources and territory...but obviously, we have a huge way to go before we reach that level in the moral evolutionary progress.
While it is true that Zarqawi wasn't literally dragged through the streets and "nobody had a foot on his head", it is equally true (or perhaps simply self-evident) that we are being treated to the electronic equivalent of having his head paraded through the whole global village. It may as well be a bloody head on a stake for all apparent implications.
I would sooner have someone discredit the evidence and call "scam" because full blown, larger than life photos in color and b/w were not made available for max saturation, public appreciation as has been done for the last 24 hours.
It seems the lesser of two evils considering that the call going out during the publicity tour of this dead guy's head for the next few days is going to be yet another genius American marketing campaign for Jihadist recruitment in over 60 different countries world wide.
As if invading Iraq for pretenses less than founded in truth wasn't enough of a Madison Avenue gimme for a thousand "Osama Wants You!" posters.
Ah,we just give and give, don't we?
There just seems no end to our generosity, that way.

Sunday, June 04, 2006

Bam! Just Like That: More on the "War".

With the recent "crack down" on several potential terrorist cells in Canada, Atlanta and elsewhere, I thought I'd riff a bit about this global "war on terror" that has wrapped us up as a nation and a culture as if in some grand, materialized Orwellian novel about totalitarianism, empiric manifestation and the current stiving for the creation of a global nationalism and the resistance that naturally follows such efforts.
The "war on terror", is little more than a nebulous, blanket of authoritianism and an open ended warrant to be used arbitrarily for the pursuit of any threat to the expansion of a universal culture that the various other cultures of the world are, and have been for some time made subject to yeilding to.
Born as a desperate reaction against an enemy with no physical state, no geographical coordinates, no definitive leadership, no uniforms and no long range, direct, conclusive objectives it may as well be fought by either faction involved under the banner of "Crush all those who would oppose us.", rather than feigning any implication that there is a genuine strategic defense that can hope to be effectively staged against such a phantasmic sort of adversary.
It's a war on anarchy and chaos but basically a war against the symptoms of two off kiltered, out of balance cultures that have both leaned too far to the right of what can be assimulated into a reality supported by our basic natural laws, whether they be animal, social or human.
History has shown that any attempt by any empire to create a universal, global culture has repeatedly and consistantly met with resistance, opposition and ultimately failure. I see no other possible outcome for us as the dominant empire or any Jihad as it's adversary.
It's the square peg of power and the will of man being jammed into the round hole of natural law and the world's natural balance which we as a species have been busily trying to tilt off axis through war and agression for approximately 5 to 10 thousands years. There will always be some one or many to oppose it.
Any solution will not come from force by any origin or by "pushing on a door that only opens by pulling on it".
It's time for the sake of cooling these 4,000 year embers and healing the planet and our species to find another option besides our inate stubborness and willingness to apply violence as our only conceivable tool.
This tool, for centuries has proven ineffective.
And this latest war, the "war on terror" appears to be just more of the same.
More to the crux of the matter a "universal, global culture" is an affront to the natural order for any life sustaining organism, man included.
Change that mind set among the world's leadership, charismatics, power hungry and power strong and perhaps, just perhaps, the solutions for the survival of any culture will become a little more feasible for securing any possible peaceful future for our species.

Saturday, May 13, 2006

Bam! Just Like That!: The 1st cut is the deepest?



Yippee, Skippy!
Another tax cut is practically on its way!
This one's geared toward people who can afford to invest in more than a mortgage, utilities, food and gas each month.
("I ain't sayin'. I'm just sayin'. Know what I'm sayin'?")
For the person or household that makes $50 thou a year, this could mean $46 bucks a year. That's a whopping 88.4 cents a week…cold cash!
Of course the banner hung over our dugout still reads "Loser Circle" because these little cuts every now and again that amount to nickel and dime cash in hand for the majority of everyone… are creating a cash deficit for the systems, both federal and local that we as tax payers have to make good on in the form of real folding money.
While we continue to still choke up the taxes for often, even basic government services such as record keeping, issuing licenses, educating the children, putting out a house fire and police response, now we get to pay even higher prices for filing fees, use permits, public area usage fees and higher state/local/property and general taxes demanded for over the counter sales and for the privilege of working and having any income at all.
I figure just the announcement of this latest "cut" is going to have them salivating in the state capitals and city halls across America.
That $46 bucks a year is going to look a lot like more increased fees for local government services on the very real street level. And with an even greater cost than local gov't could have ever asked or hoped for originally from the "pollies" on Capital Hill. You see "We the people" have no recourse but to accept and pay a tax notice, while bills for funding before congress can be vetoed and defeated by our illustrious, always looking out for us, "representatives".
The food chain looks something like this:
The feds hide behind these tax cuts and give less to the states. The states then have less to give to the counties. As a result the counties then have no choice but to give less for basic operational funding to the cities… The money has got to come from somewhere, folks. And it "trickles down" on us.
Thus, a lousy $46 bucks, that appears to be a win for the little guy (that can invest)turns into at least that much being asked for basic services, individually, from all three of the above mentioned sources, turning that $46 windfall into a $150 to $200 deficit in most mid to low income homes.
People making $20,000…$30,000 or $40,000 per year aren't even in the running for this "tax cut". Yet they will surely have to foot the bill asked by state and local authorities for the dwindling funding.
People who are millionaires will retain approximately what any two of these households will live on, (before taxes) for a year.
If no one has noticed the rises in state/local government taxes and fees for services since the first "tax cut" went into effect some 3 or 4 years ago that yielded on average a dollar per day to the median household in America, then maybe my house is the exception to the rule and I'm making a point about nothing at all here but a very isolated and individual problem. The law of averages is against that being the case however; and you must know that.
And so, in this instance the deepest cut is hardly limited to the first, as the song and old adage would suggest. Each and every "cut" that meets legislative approval is akin to the death of 1000 cuts for the average home in this country and a benefit to the affluent.
But the myth will continue that we all have taxation with representation.
Some of us may gain some small amount of pocket change…less per week than what could get you on public transportation for a day, …in return everyone will be shelling out 3 to 4 times that amount once again for the exaggerated figures needed to make up for the diminishing federal funding for our local government services.
Yippee, Skippy!
Another tax cut is practically on its way!

Saturday, May 06, 2006

"May I take your (natural) order? Or What Really Seperates Man from Animals...(maybe)


Slowly but surely time heals all wounds . . . and wounds all heels. As such, as the President's approval rating would imply, he and his posse are edging ever closer to getting their comeuppance.
Now that the message seems to be out there, I'm finding the means to back away from my angry obsession with the state of the union and it's leadership, just enough to get back to allowing the gray matter to meander into more philosophical pastures.
Of late I've been pondering just what sets mankind apart from our animal brethren.
There was a time I'd have told you that it was our ability to laugh. But I have a Lab-mix at home that actually smiles at us in our family. Kind of a sly, Elvis curling of the upper lip that was spooky until we confirmed that he only did this when he was glad to see one of us rather than when he wanted us to leave him be. And ok, it's a smile and not a laugh, but I figure if he can go that far, he probably has his moments where he secretly gets a chuckle or two outta stuff.
I've seen film footage too of dolphins and chimpanzees who, in their own fashion seemed to be sharing a guffaw or two. So maybe laughing isn't the thing that sets us apart.
Later I'd have contended that perhaps the difference between the species was that mankind could laugh at itself. But I've seen so little of that, that I've become either too jaded or cynical to put much weight behind that theory anymore.
Then it occurred to me that maybe what set us apart from them was our ability to actually comprehend that there are other species and such.
In all fairness however; I could never be so self aggrandizing as to think for a moment that I had any idea what goes on in, say an iguana's head, let alone share any real insight into what he or she can or could not comprehend.
Then recently a genuinely viable possibility was presented to me in a book I was reading. The author, by way of telling his tale proposed that mankind, at least modern mankind…say within the last 10,000 years of our approximately 3 million year (widely accepted) earthly existence was different from all the other animals on the planet because we are the only species who willingly (yet inexplicably) make it a practice to lock our food away from each other and all other of God's creatures and force our selves to find a means to win it back from storage through labor.
While this difference is cultural as opposed to organic, genetic or biological it does stand, along with other probable reasons as at least a part of the answer to my ponderence.
Figure. For the better part of 3 million years, man existed in a forage/hunt and gather mode and much like any species on the planet, food was basically anyone's for the taking. Plant a few seeds here, pull up a root there, hunt some game over there, catch a fish over here. Thankfully with better living through tool use, man as well as all other species were presented with a planet that yielded free food to everything and everyone.
Fast forward to the last 10,000 years and as a result of the agrarian revolution, you can't get a meal without a paycheck or a meal check of some sort anymore…anywhere. The millennia of the "free lunch" is over.
How did we get here? How did we come to believe that this was the better way to live rather than the means proven effective since our time began?
Because we're the more intelligent species? "The smartest monkeys"?
Well, while the rest of creation simply goes their way and eats off the fruit of the land without a care or a cost, we on the other hand spend 8, 10, 12 or more hours each day in voluntary bondage to other people in order that we might buy back a product that the earth has been producing and supplying all life forms with, since the day it cooled down from a fiery furnace for free. We've decided to depend and become reliant on others to provide our very nourishment, then we simply shake our heads and excuse it with a resigned "that's just the way it is!".
That's not the way it is, folks. That's what we accepted and choose to do, contrary to the natural laws that existed before the last 10,000 years. That's what we, unlike every and any other species on the planet have made of our existence on planet earth.
And for me, it goes a long way towards pointing out just what makes mankind different from the rest of the residents here on "God's little half acre".
We got to a point where we felt bold enough to mess with the natural order of things. And now we have little option but to work all week for "the man" in order to buy back the very food that the earth once gave us all for free as a birthright.
Why? As stated, For some reason or many, the culture of modern man agreed to let someone lock it all up!
Enjoy the weekend.
Monday and returning to the treadmill are just around the corner.

Saturday, April 29, 2006

Fun Facts From Zach's Almanac


Under a bill approved by lawmakers today, the Mexican government has decided to decriminalize small amounts of cocaine, marijuana, heroin, even ecstasy for personal use.

I'm repeatedly amazed at how often the newer democracies of even third world countries manage to practice more progressive legislation that provides greater personal liberites than our own in spite of our being considered the world standard for liberty and freedom.

Meanhile, back in the good old U.S., even pictures of Marijuana are controlled substances.
Let freedom ring!

Monday, April 17, 2006

Some of the headlines in today's news:

"Bush aids told, if you want to go, go now."
Oh my God! Can I be excused too!

"Bus carrying pilgrims plunges off cliff"
Where did they find pilgrims in this day and age? I thought they were all gone centuries ago.

"Study calculates impact of 1906 earthquake."
This isn't "NEWS" anymore!

"Gas rises again at the pumps"
I believe I had predicted somewhere in one of these blogs that the $3 bucks a gallon we paid in September would look like a discount price by Memorial Day. Just another 10 billion dollar quarterly profit for the oil boys!

"What will sex be like in the future?"
Hell, I can't even remember what it was like in the past!

"Retiring Exxon honcho's $400 Million golden parachute"
See above re: gas prices.

"Suicide Bomber Kills 9 at Tel Aviv Eatery"
OK, repeat after me."H-o-m-i-c-i-d-e bomber". Ya meatheads! What don't you get about this after all these years?




And finally, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld defended his leadership today insisting that the reason he should remain Secretary is that both he and President Bush share common interests, goals, and size of genitalia. "And of course there will be detractors" he added, "But regardless of all the negative press you're reading, this IS in fact six inches! No. Really. It is!"

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

"Gypsy's Biz" or The new business of creating businesses to create business


The wife is the chief administrator for her office. Has been forever or at least since the day when someone first decided how to spell the words "business office". In the course of that time she has had to plan and organize relocations for the office and staff with the frequency only experienced by most army brats and their families, far more often than most families would consider uprooting themselves and taking up residence in another burrow, at any rate. A living testament to the illusion of the stability of business. Generally, she (the wife) shops around for the best price in office movers. You know those people who make their lively-hood moving desks and chairs and all the warmth and comforts of cubicles from one floor of a building to another or from one building to another. Office movers are not to be mistaken for office "movers and shakers" per se, because well, the former are as a rule a lot more industrious and productive than the latter. Perhaps it has something to do with not resting on the perks of a college degree which teaches little more than the theory of working for a living…but some (especially people with a degree) would disagree with this assessment, to be sure.
At any rate, recently, having decided to contract the services of a group of movers who had done an exemplary job for her in the past and at a fair price, the wife was informed that as corporate need would have it, she would have to solicit an agency bound by national corporate contract to secure and arrange the logistics of getting all the stuff from point A to point B.
As it turns out, said agency charged a much prettier penny than the originally found local moving company, but the best part was this…the agency proposed a price and informed the wife and her management that the company who would contact them for planning was, none other than the very company she had negotiated and come to terms with in the first place! Of course, being brokered by the agency, there were greater estimations of how many hours it would take, less flexibility in scheduling and the promise of a week worth of down time for the office in question…but hey for a few grand above and beyond the originally proposed deal negotiated between the Wife and the moving company, you can't expect everything, can you?
And here's the point of all this blather on my part…it would appear that all to often in the 21st century the gross national product has become the creation, not of product, not of service and not anything as lofty as even intellectual property. The business of American business is primarily the creation of more business! This agency for example is in the business of tacking on a large sum of money to the cost of a service performed by someone else like some Hollywood agent who reaps the benefits of profit for simply making a phone call, outsourcing a project from A to Z without so much as a detail of involvement and then have someone contact the Wife so that negotiations could then finally begin between the parties involved at that point in time. A middle man industry.
Case #2. Our family dentist was a good guy. We saw him for years, without so much as the need for treatment beyond the typical cleaning and entrenching every six months. I say "was" because unfortunately, on the way to the office one morning one of the big laws, the law of inertia over-rulled our dentist's plans for that day and he was stopped by an immovable object in the shape of another automobile which put a kink in the rest of his day, as well as for any and all so much as remotely involved and created quite a bit more inconvenience and heart ache to boot for his survivors. Yes, Virginia, it’s true. It seems "only the good (do) die young".
Fast forward about a year and now his practice is under new professional management and staff. In a half dozen visits since it's opening and close to a dozen visits since that time by me and the fam', we've compiled a large sum in payments for services, never really mentioned by our dearly departed dentist. The implications would be that the whole Fox family should be toothless hags based on the past prognosis' of our previous dental professional and drinking our meals through a straw. Suddenly, we are in need of root scalings, floride treatments and even fillings for potential, yet to develop cavities and all with insurance coverage estimates that have the accuracy of a long range weather forcast!
("Uh, did you want that in silver or the much more expensive matching white porcelin which is so-o much more attractive?"
"Who cares? This thing is so far back in my head, it would take a thousand years and an anthropologist studying ancient dentistry to dig up my remains to ever see the damned thing! Pack a piece of tin foil in there for all I give a hoot!")

Coincidence? I don't think so.
And don't get me wrong. These new guys are good folks too. With their hearts in the right place, I'm sure. But even in this instance…it's pretty obvious that we're dealing with a business whose primary concern is the business of creating more business. And maybe with a keenly sharp focus on keeping the electric billed paid for the office.
Case #3. I've been a geek and actively employed in the Information services since 1985. The drill used to go like this …You see an ad for a job, apply for it, perhaps get the interview, nail it and get the job. Or not, of course, but the onus and the job was a result of a direct feed between a technical person and a business or a company that needed to hire one and have them on staff for specific technical reasons. Now however, in the 21st century, 85% of all hiring for network administration and help desk support (if not outsourced overseas) is done through the use of technical service agencies. You never get to make personal contact with the employer on your own merit or identity. Instead you simply "represent" an agency, who will send you out on interviews, set your salary before hand, collect almost as much per hour for your actual labor should you get the position and will even negotiate with the potential employer the length of your employment before you even have the opportunity to accept it. Sometimes, two to six months later, the contract between the employer and the agency (having met it's expiration date) puts you back into the interviewing mode with a new potential employer for whom you can again represent not yourself, but the agency and get this,…if the previous employer wanted to, they can not, without either paying off the agency some kind of signing fee or facing breech of contract hire the said, God-actual technical person as a company employee, if they thought that person could walk on water.
Again, the business of creating business over rides any actual production or provision of services in the name of, what? Perhaps adding some unnecessary administration? What do these agencies do, actually? Nothing but act as a middle-person, make sometimes more or as much as the schlub who actually checks in and performs a task for the employer on a daily basis and no one seems to question the validity of this spirit-like and costly connection between the employer, laborer and the superficial yet etheral entity known as "the agency".

In this and many other instances which are expanding daily, folks, we have created a national product based on the creation of nothing more than making more business.
Some friends of mine from way back, were (and still are) some very fine musicians and song writers. They once penned and performed a tune called "Gypsy's Biz". The "biz" part was a reference to shit, or more specifically perhaps, the bullshit or scams put about by this roving demographic in the course of their trying to get by and get over.
This whole business of creating business that serves no purpose but to create more business reminds me of this song every damned time I see yet another example of it.
Some will say it's simply good and good for business. I see it as nothing more than "biz"!

Wednesday, March 29, 2006

Bam! Just like that!: Justice For All??


Jack Abramoff was sentenced Wednesday to shy of six years in some form of prison for committing fraud in the purchase of a fleet of gambling boats. The whole enchilada revolves around Jack and his cohort making a deal and copping a plea arrangement for "concocting a fake $23 million wire transfer to make it appear they were contributing their own money toward the purchase of the $147.5 million SunCruz Casinos gambling fleet. Based on that fraudulent transfer, lenders provided the pair with $60 million in financing". Nice work if you can get it. Or get away with it. And given that it's unlikely that this was Jack's first foray into this sort of affair, at least in this instance, he didn't. Well at least he scraped past the punishment fitting the crime possibilities, completely.
A car thief averages a five year term, just one year less for stealing a Crown Vic or a BMW than this white collar guy got for pilfering tens of millions, but when you got the connections Jack has these days, he can count on the kind of breaks even an honest to God Tony Soprano can only fantasize on.
You see, Jack has also been a busy boy in purchasing various congress-people from both sides of the aisle for some time now. A much more insidious activity and an easily interpreted act of subversion and perhaps treasonous behavior which in effect holds conspiratorial overtones involving manipulating and impeding the very functioning of our government…but as yet, little has come in the way of jurist prudence, even in this post 9/11 world of homeland security and tribunals for others for far, far lesser transgressions.
Back to the trial that was the diversion from those facts that it was. Jack will remain free while helping prosecutors with a vast bribery investigation involving members of Congress. This is truly more irony at it's best considering this is definitely a matter of the fox snitching out the chickens in the very coop in which the fox was performing his B&E. Smell like entrapment? After all, what's Jack possibly going to contribute to the investigations but the names of the very people he himself led down the garden path with plump and greedy promises. For this some of those he tempted with the apple will be publicly humiliated and if the voters even care months from now they may be cast from the Eden known as Washington.
For his cooperation, Jack will get an even further reduced sentence than his pending minimum plea-bargained one.
Lady Justice surely is blind. And more than likely tone deaf to boot!
In a country which hinges it's pride on equitable justice for all, there are people doing seven years for tampering with their electricity meters and under the laws of fifteen states you can get a life sentence for a nonviolent marijuana offense. To put as fine a point on this as necessary, there has been many more than one case documented in America of people getting life without parole for a joint or less.
In Montana you can get a life sentence for a first offense for simply growing one (that's o-n-e!) marijuana plant.
But relax, if you're charged under federal law, you might get off with a ten-year sentence.
Not Jack, however.
Sixty million plus in swindle, with who knows how much was then filtered into whose re-election campaigns and Voila…less than six years and diminishing based on whatever satisfaction pending Prosecutors may attest to at some undisclosed moment in the future.
Listen. The point I'm making is not a call to arms to legalize a natural substance which has been proven scientifically harmless, especially when compared to others that are truly destructive yet widely and legally available to the public.
My point is that there is a gross imbalance in our laws and justice system when Blue Collar Johnnies can face a decade of incarceration for a benign personal practice which harms no one and Jack Abramoff and the likes of Ken Lay and his posse can swindle, cheat and lie to the detriment of hundreds of thousands on a national level and have it pretty much swept under a rug because those high ranking people entertaining associations with these felons don't wish to be further implicated or exposed for putting their own interests ahead of those of the people, our government and our constitution.
These are the laws which we are told we must all live by. These are the laws that are manipulated through misdirection and contrivence by the very people we depend on to uphold them in perpetuity to the end of equal distribution for all.
Today's news about Abramoff just confirms what we've all seen repeatedly before.
And I don't know. I don't get it.
Justice like this doesn't mean Jack to most Americans, I figure.

Tuesday, March 07, 2006

Bam! Just like that! "Something wicked this way comes..."

If you listen carefully you may hear the faint sound of the drums of war being beaten to the cadence of our imminent and pending invasion of Iran. It's not quite as catchy as say, Ginger Baker, although there are some strains from "Toad" to it. Ok, maybe toadies would be more accurate. But it has all the repetitiveness that was offered up in the Gulf War I and II to remind one of Wipe Out, fer sure.
The chain of events are quite similar to what preceded our most recent invasion of Iraq. The leadership and the roles they play are pretty much the same. The initial rumblings and the creation of headlines based on "whisper campaigns" are being mirrored as well. Only the impetus and causes have shifted to any real noticeable degree. Yet you and I will hardly notice it for all the misinformation being treated as factual information. Actually the differences can hardly be detected at all if one considers that it all really boils down to sheer media manipulation and yet another crusade based on the creation of a nationalistic social environment built upon willfull suggestion and what will also most likely again later be revealed as yet another unfounded atmosphere of fear staged for just another less than genuine cause.
Given that more than a few impartial historians and military analysts have publicly expressed their conclusions that Iraq is now actively in the throes of a civil war and has been for approximately six months now, despite the claims of the Pentagon and our White House (that the car bombings and explosions have been driven and directed by "foreign insurgents" and al Queda whose only interests are anti-American activity,) there's evidently this and a whole lot of information about the current Iraq situation that remains beyond the grasp of those same millions of American taxpayers who, when polled to this day still believe against all evidence that Iraq has WMD's and poses a genuine threat to America. Many of them probably also believe that Elvis can still be spotted at the local roadside diner if they just remain ever vigilant for his arrival.
The truth however, I believe goes a little something like this.
In the event of an official civil war in Iraq between, (as the factions involved actually are,) the Shiites and the Sunni's, the US will no longer have a viable part in it other than having created the very power vacuum that allowed this civil war to be born, nurtured and grown into what it is today…A mess. As such, not only would the US lose it's valued foothold in ol' Mesopotamia, but our leaders will have even less than the vapor-ware they already maintain as a reason for our military efforts to date or to remain in that area of the globe since we as an occupation force can hardly favor one side of this civil war over the other without admittedly imposing our design on the very country that we so righteously claim to have liberated for the purpose of establishing Iraq's self determination. Can't have that now can we? At least not right up front.
So, what are the options? Well, if we just had another small country somewhere in the neighborhood where we could bivouac our troops, say in the name of American and world security in much the same way Iraq came in handy. Or due to the threat of nuclear weapons and WMDs in much the same way Iraq came in handy. Hey. Forget about the fact that Iran's President was elected democratically. It wasn't what our leadership considers a real democracy, anyway. Besides, technically, Saddam was elected by the people too. But again, not by the standards of our leadership. Maybe a few hanging chads and people turned away at the polls would have been more acceptable. Or perhaps eliminate the popular voice of the people completely and have a Supreme Court pick the winner…There…now we're talking a true democracy! At any rate, let's suppose we could get a few admonishments and imposed sanctions from the U.N. just to get the ball rolling. Again, in much the same design as was used with Iraq. Then, after generating just the right climate politically we can totally disregard the call from the U.N. to use diplomacy and once again "go it alone" with our coalition of the well heeled 3rd world nations and enter Iran…Well, hell. They were warned! But here's the beauty part. Ready? Once we have boots in Iran, we can just sit out the civil war across the street in Iraq, deliver training and weapons to which ever side we think would best uphold our ideals for a week or two at a time and then waltz back in whenever and as often as we can see an opening or the opportunity for a covert operation. Brilliant!
Stay in the middle east…annex two countries for the price of one and no one back here at home will be the wiser because, hey! Ain't you glad we're fighting the terrorists over there instead of in small town America??? You bet!
If you've been reading/watching the news lately the same scenario is beginning to play out as it did leading up to Iraq. Just yesterday, having not gained enough comfortable traction with the nuclear threat some would have us believe Iran poses (just like Saddam did)for us, the politico-military PR men have now started to accuse Iran of supplying new, special and much more dangerous explosives to the insurgents to use against our troops in Iraq. This is based on the same maybe's and might be's that were used to build a case for invading Iraq in the first place, if you recall. And still fails to hold any basis in fact.
Our political and military complex (if I may be so redundant) has perfected making statements to the press and international boards and bodies to the full extent of generating their own desired results for a select agenda in direct opposition to the better welfare of our nation and have repeatedly pimped a manipulated world response. Unfortunately, behind all too many of these sort of reality moldings, from Iran-Contra during the Reagan regime through now two gulf wars these proven falsehoods, although an effective means to a variety of agressive and futile ends have been found to be lacking in both honorable intent or factual accounting with an impecable consistency.
The signs are all around us, people. And here we likely go again. History has left us with little else to reasonably expect from these folks who currently lead us.

Wednesday, March 01, 2006

Fun Facts From Zach's Almanac: Anna's story...Support our Olympians...and DOH! Why the system is breaking down.

Having resurfaced from my previous dark, political postings and after cleansing my outlook/palate by catching up on some reading…(Vonnegut's Galapagos, actually, and just now digging into some Robert Anton Wilson, neither of which are likely to improve my jaundiced view of our species or our shared human condition…) I opened the news to find that our nation's highest court, having obviously vanquished and resolved the backlogged myriad of questions on justice for all which lay like a wasteland before it, posed to impact our nation of 270 million souls has turned it's focus on property law and whether or not one, lone person in the celebrity of Anna Nicole Smith is entitled to her 1.6 billion dollar inheritance. You go girl! So how many people really do you figure will be effected by this decision by the Supreme Court, anyway? Well there's Anna and her council…and the opposition and their council…and that's pretty much it if you don't count the staff at Elaine's or where ever Ms. Smith goes to celebrate her victory and inclusion into our history books as a precedent, afterwards…Well, there's me too. Because Anna and I go way back…Oh yeah…A little known bit of history that must have fell below the radar of the popparazzi…but that's a long story…and I'd really have to dream it …er, remember it first. As I recall "it was a dark and stormy night…"

The Winter Games are over…Well certainly not all of them as the press can attest to each day, but the ones that involve skiing and skating and curling. What the hell is curling about anyway? I can't remember the last time a bunch of kids waited anxiously for a car to pass so they could get back to continuing their game of curling on any side street of America. While no one could possibly doubt that our Olympians gave all these contests their best effort, we didn't fare as well as the media would have liked. Well, not everybody ever does. The disgust was obvious by the raspberries that immediately followed the games because our entrants didn't snarf up all the gold that was available. And let's face it. The same entities that generate profits from this volunteer sporting event stood to gain even more if we had swept the events. Bode, who was turned into the poster boy for down hill (and whose stock went like-wise after coming up short) was particularly dismissed after he failed to do what the hype had led everyone to expect from him. And Gawd forbid, our best figure skaters walked the thin ice of public admonishment after missing the opportunity for an international shut out. It would have been nice, if in the course of slamming these athletes representing the best in us after the fact, someone, anyone had taken a little front page ink to simply say "Thank you for your efforts." instead of dismissing them en mass and portraying them as a bunch of failures. If being able to compete with the world's very best and giving them a run for their money is failure…how many million of us, journalists included, fail to meet even that level of failure by miles? A fickle bunch we can appear to be when someone doesn't manage to bring home the gold in America. Or win a series or a Superbowl. Hell, from the press I've seen, even silver and bronze are worthless recyclable scrap unless they are awarded to some other country. Then just because we escaped it, it's value increases. It doesn't matter that the people who earned them are like up there with the very best in the world at what they do…And so much for teaching the kids that giving one's best is best and remains noble and appreciated. Careful folks our culture is once again showing. And in our culture, if you ain't first, you may as well be last because that's how you're going to be painted…and then of course, quickly forgotten.
Makes you wonder why our Olympians bother to try at all sometimes, doesn't it?

And finally…"DOH!"
CHICAGO Mar 1, 2006 (AP)—
The McCormick Tribune Freedom Museum found that 22 percent of Americans could name all five Simpson family members, compared with just one in 1,000 people who could name all five First Amendment freedoms. Americans apparently know more about "The Simpsons" than they do about the First Amendment.
Only one in four Americans can name more than one of the five freedoms guaranteed by the First Amendment (freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and petition for redress of grievances.) But more than half can name at least two members of the cartoon family, according to a survey.


Quick! Get me in touch with the Saint in charge of the Eternal Silver Lining!

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Dear American Voters Fund and Midwestheroes.com


So you would have us believe all of these people are now in Iraq effectively pinned down and contained by our occupation?? And because of this America is to any degree safer beause of it?
What ever logic could this argument be based upon?
In May of 2004 the BBC reported that the London-based International Institute for Strategic Studies announced it's findings that
"the group (al Qeada) has 18,000 potential operatives and
is present in more than 60 countries.".
Here's that original article.

Friday, February 17, 2006

BAM! Just like that!: Progress for America Voter Fund commercials

There's an awful lot of talk going on about those commercials that have been airing which appear to star mainstream Americans zealously espousing their support of the Bush administration's view on the progress and righteousness of our invasion of Iraq. (Personally I refuse to call it a "war", simply because "war" was never officially declared by Congress as it need be, which makes it all somewhat of an illegal "war" at best.)
The ads, are produced and paid for by a group called the Progress for America Voter Fund, another of the many 527 soft money organizations who, much like the philosophically opposed organization Moveon.org, have a tendency to spin things out with enough slant as to make the sinking Titanic seem like a level playing field.
The big difference this group can lay claim to, (although they wouldn't think of publicly doing so) is it's status as a tax-exempt organization with direct links to the current administration and promoting President Bush's "Agenda For America". Aside from raising $38 million for the President's 2004 bid, some of the causes also championed by this group are as far reaching as the privatization of Social Security, Judiciary appointments, and the now infamous Swift Boat Veterans group and campaign which was used to defame the only combat veteran in the last election.
If anyone is interested in knowing more about this org, click here for more info:
Here
A word of caution. Anyone (like me fer' instance!) can write and publish on the web, and as was seen recently on Wikipedia.com many of these web sources can be edited by anyone with a computer and an axe to grind to any extent of factuality or fiction. The same limitations certainly apply to the above link to SourceWatch.org which I have used as a reference. But it provides a wide range of references that will allow the curious to cross check media and other sources as a means to validate what you've read on this subject or others you find there.

Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Fun Facts From Zach's Almanac: Operation Quail-Safe...a trying perspective...and Le Pew to you.

Ok. So being Cheney isn't all it's cracked up to be. Of course, being one of his hunting buddies on his annual "shooting quail in a barrel" excursion is worse.
Hey, Dick! You can put somebody's eye out with one of those things! And sure accidents happen. But you should know Sir, that generally, we little people have to report these things, you know, mishaps where guns are involved…to the authorities a damned sight sooner than 24 hours after the fact.
Well, thank heaven the guy survived it. 'cause who knows? If he hadn't, by the time it hit the press, we might have been looking at a suicide.
Oh! Did I say that out loud?

Saddam showed up in court today. Resplendent in what would best be described in our culture as a house coat.
The guy is pissed.
Well, I would think I would be too if the world's largest super power was trying to bring me up on charges of being Hitler incarnate and all they could come up with to support that argument was an incident that happened 14 years ago and involved about 200 people, on anecdotal evidence alone…none of which has yet to place me either at the scene or directly responsible for whatever went on. You don't even need a Johnny Cockran to beat this rap O.J. Christ!
Go on. Ask Bush…Shit happens beyond the grasp of leadership. Look at F.E.M.A./Katrina fer cryin' out loud!
And all of this righteous pursuit of justice for 200 people over 14 years ago, from a source that took out about 10,000 Iraqi civilians in the very first days of "shock and awe" when it was decided to invade a country a half globe away, based on nothing but hubris. Yeah. I'd be meekly hangin' my head in shame. And behind it all, any person with an ounce of intelligence would be wondering why, (if any of these claims were meant to be taken seriously,)… why would anyone need to reach back to an incident 14 years in the past to prosecute? Why not bring up charges on some thing that happened like, 15 days or 15 minutes before the US invasion?
You'd think that if they had a better case to hang this crap on they'd be using it, don't cha? Well, sometimes the simplest answer is the correct one. And maybe they just don't have a good case. Not really. It's as possible as it is not. Well, there wasn't one for the war itself when you come to think about it. Was there?
Hey…I'm not sayin'… I'm just sayin'. Know what I'm sayin'? Just something to think about.

And finally, with today being the jour d' lamour…(as if my English spelling wasn't bad enough!) let me leave you with this…


…and really, who says it better than Pepe?