"Hateful" is a subjective and relative term...unless it's being used to inflame and create hate in someone for someone else...directly as it seems to be regularly in speeches and the press with regard to Iran. It's infinitely more hateful than anything said by A-Jad at the UN yesterday; no matter how much the feel good people wish to parade around in their their hypersensitivity in the 21st century.
If I wished to offend you I would hardly simply deny a holocaust or some point in history nearly 70 years ago
And until someone can explain how laws of science could have been suspended on 9/11 to permit a falling object the size of a skyscraper to fall at the same scientifically accepted velocity as an object in "free fall" A-Jad's opinion is no different than mine or yours on the subject and open for discussion without implying hate or intended offense of any kind.
If this was hate speech, what do you make of the ongoing barrage of talk in the press by US officials and their allies about the need to attack Iran because they are attempting to generate electricity with nuclear power plants once or twice a week?
Now that, without question is definitely and bluntly "hate speech". It's direct, beyond merely implicated and poses a genuine physical threat to the intended.
Where is everyone's compassionate sensitivity when these events happen?
Nowhere to be found.
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
